The answer is A. Providing legal advice
Water is the home of fish. If there won't be water then there won't be fish as fish can't survive without water. Similarly, education is like the water and profession is like the fish. Education makes a person skilled, trained, capable to perform a job. If someone tries to do a job without gaining some sort of education then it will be very hard for them to do that particular job properly. Education provides us knowledge and skill to perform any task in a job efficiently and effectively. Education helps to develop one's confidence, knowledge, skills and makes one ready to do any type of job. Education makes a direct contribution to the production of skilled manpower. So without education there won't be any profession.
Creditors are interested in the times interest earned ratio because they want to "<span>have adequate protection against a potential drop in earnings jeopardizing their interest payments".
</span>
The times interest earned ratio is also known as interest coverage ratio, which measures the capacity of an association to pay its obligation commitments. The proportion is generally utilized by banks to discover whether an debt borrower can bear to assume any extra obligation. It might be figured as either EBIT or EBITDA divided by the aggregate interest which is payable.
Answer:
Flexible resources
Explanation:
Flexible resources are defined as those that can be utilised under different categories of resource groups.
They are able to serve multiple functions.
For example money can be used for different activities like production of goods, training of staff, purchase of raw materials, and so on.
Time can be allocated to different endeavours.
Same applies to energy. It can be focused on pursuing various objectives
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
