Answer:
its b kdkdkdkdkdkdksdjdjd
I’m virtual ................
They changed it to allow slavery and the slave trade to continue and expand
The constitution was pretty much the same as the North but it allowed slavery
Answer:
lose because employee contracts that restrict trade are illegal
Explanation:
The above case relates to the restraint of trade. Export limitations are a concept in customary law referring to the constitutionality in commercial limits on the right to do commerce. This is a forerunner to the current rule to competition.
A statutory commitment not to exchange is null and unenforceable towards the Promiser as opposed to the national policy of encouraging commerce, although the restriction of exchange is fair to preserve the rights of a trade buyer. Trade restrictions may also manifest as binding covenants in work arrangements throughout post-termination.
Answer:
The electoral college is working the way it is supposed to.
Explanation:
The president of the United States is the President of all the lands owned by the US, not the president of only the major cities. The Electoral College was created to balance out the population with the land. For example, if we take into account and allow the Democrats to get what they want (i.e., popular vote), it will lead to large segments of the population being cut off from the political realm. With the popular vote only, candidates will only reach out to large population areas, as they have the higher chances of receiving the message and to vote for them. In the end, the electoral college is in place to ensure that all groups of the US, no matter where they live, are reached out too. The Popular vote is not the way to go, and if the Democrats want to get rid of the Electoral College, they must put in a system that is better than it. Remember, the Electoral College, while it does has it's faults, solves a gruesome problem of keeping the president from being the president of the major cities, to being the president of the land.
~
