Hello.
Why anyone would want an advantage for this, I don't know. It's nearly impossible to figure out any. Yet, I did. You're welcome.
Advantages:
✯ Everything would be harmonious, whether it be bad or good.
✯There would be no such thing as, "picky people."
✯There would be no arguments over social issues.
Disadvantages:
✯There would not be any variety that shapes communities.
✯Opinions would be virtually nonexistent.
✯Individuals would be prone to be controlled.
✯People's beliefs would be so similar that they'd become facts to them.
Answer: A. Producers are often trying to persuade you of things that might not be good for you.
“One of the things that it stands for is this vexing notion that a great nation can consist entirely of refugees from other nations, that people of different, even warring religions and cultures can live, if not side by side, then on either side of the country’s Chester Avenues.”
Answer:
The physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients.
Scientists are more easily able to control an animal's environment, such as diet and temperature, than they are that of humans, which makes the tests far more reliable than alternative methods.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the claim and the counterclaim that come with this question:
<em>Claim:</em><em> Although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made.</em>
<em>Counterclaim: </em><em>There are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals.</em>
This is the evidence that would most weaken the counterclaim. In this example, the counterclaim states that there are other safer and more accurate ways of testing medications besides the use of animals. However, this evidence shows that these tests are the most accurate because of the similar physiologies of some animals and some humans. It also shows that these tests are safer because it is easier to control an animal's environment than that of a human.
Answer:
can you say it clearly in comment please
