Explanation:
A. Environmental Sources of Stress:
It is the stressors arising from environmental factors that can threaten the employee's work in some way.
2- Economic uncertalinty
5- Technological change
B. Organizational Sources of Stress:
This stress derives from internal or external conflicts that can occur at work, such as personal charges and poor relationships with other employees.
1. Task demands
4. Interpersonal demands
C. Personal Sources of Stress:
These are the stressors arising from the employee's personal life, which can directly impact the quality with which the employee performs his work.
3. Economic problems
6. Family problems
Answer:
less than zero
Explanation:
According to the law of demand, an increase in price reflects in a decrease in demad. That is, price and demand are inversely proportional. Since ax is associated with the price of good X, it must be negative to accurately describe that behavior in the demand function.
Thus, ax will be: less than zero.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
true<em> </em><em>yh </em><em>no </em><em>chang</em><em>e</em><em>s </em><em>true</em><em> </em><em>all </em><em>the</em><em> way</em>
Answer:
1. per se application
U.S. Competition Law
This law checks whether certain parts of a contract or agreement have violated US antitrust laws.
2. Misuse of activity
EU Competition Law
This is part of the European Union's competition law that prohibits the use of activity to try to gain unfair advantges.
3. Extraterritoriality
US and EU
This is a provision in both US and EU anti-competition and anti-trust laws that states that the activities of foreign companies fall under the law if these activities influence the people within the jurisdiction of the US or the EU.
4. Trade obstacle, nontariff
France
These are a part of the French system.
5. Strict liability
U.S. Tort Law
A concept in US Tort law that states that a person is liable for an offence they committed and their state of mind or intent when they committed said offence is irrelevant.
6. Punitive damages
U.S. Product Liability Law
A concept in the US that allows for the extra punishment of the party in the wrong to dissuade others from doing so and to reward the party in the right more justly.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
From the above information, we can deduce that the stock owned by Carol and Dave falls in value by $2,000 I.e ($10,000 - $8,000) ; it is to be noted that Carol solely has realised and recognized loss of $2,000.
Here, one of the cogent factors that determines whether a sale has taken place is if realization has been effected. Here, stock sold by Carol qualifies as a disposition while the decline in the value of stock sold by Dave does not qualify as disposition.
With regards to the foregoing, we can conclude that the federal income tax law treat the decline in the value of the stock differently for Carol and Dave.
