1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AlekseyPX
2 years ago
9

Natural selection does not always result in an increase in genetic diversity.

Biology
2 answers:
kozerog [31]2 years ago
7 0

The right answer is True.

If the selection is made on the phenotype, at the individual level, the understanding of the variation of the characters over time and thus of the evolutionary processes requires that one is interested on a larger scale: sets of individuals ( populations).

The genetic diversity resulting from mutations and rearrangements of the genome means that at a given moment, a natural population is not homogenous from a genetic point of view: there are for the most part genes and sequences several alleles, whose frequencies ( allelic frequencies) will vary over time (it could increase, and sometimes decreaqse geneic diversity between the individuals).

Neporo4naja [7]2 years ago
3 0
T it is not always diversity 
You might be interested in
You are a dietician. Your client wants to discuss an image he found online while trying to conduct his own research about health
Sever21 [200]

Answer:

....

Explanation:

heud

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement is true about climate change and biodiversity?
8090 [49]
Climate change and biodiversity are two completely different things. In some areas, climate change will increase biodiversity, allowing more species to live in certain climates, but it will make some species lose their habitats. Biodiversity helps ecosystems thrive, and generally keeps things in balance. However, introducing too many species in an area can cause increase competition for food, risking predators of different species to kill one another off. Both climate change and biodiversity can be good and bad.

Answer: C. It can help some species and hurt others.
3 0
3 years ago
We know of species that are no longer living because we have observations. written records. fossil evidence. we do not know this
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
I'm thinking it might be fossil evidence. Hope it helps!  
3 0
3 years ago
Need help need help need help
Juliette [100K]
You can just ask a question and we can help what do you need help u
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which<br> of the following could be considered a reliable source of scientific<br> information?
Charra [1.4K]
The answer is C. A textbook
3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Geologists have long recognized that earthquakes are not randomly distributed on Earth but occur in concentrated areas that coin
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following surrounds the individual muscle cell?
    15·1 answer
  • In which trimester does the fetus move and kick, form fine hair called lanugo, typically assume the fetal position (with the hea
    9·1 answer
  • WILL MARK U AS BRAINLIST
    5·1 answer
  • Jill stepped on a tack. Which part of the central nervous system caused her foot to move off the tack quickly in a reflex respon
    5·2 answers
  • The amount of water a body requires for survival is dependent upon the climate and the individual's level of physical activity.
    15·2 answers
  • How does the circulatory system work
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me I’m giving out brainliest and I’ll give out a free 50points if someone helps
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes a heritable adaptation brought about by natural selection?
    15·1 answer
  • Giving brainliest , only number one pls
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!