It is the fourth choice - 1/4.
There are five odd number out of the ten number they are choosing from.
The probability that Jason will choose an odd number is 5/10 = 1/2
The probability that Kyle will choose an odd number is 5/10 = 1/2
Multiply the two probabilities to get the probability of them choosing odd numbers.
1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4
Answer:
1024 or A
Step-by-step explanation:
64 x4 is 256 x4 it's a 1024
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
→ First understand what Pythagoras theorem is
Pythagoras is a theorem used to find the hypotenuse (the side opposite to the right-angle) of a triangle. We would need the base lengths as well the height in order to use Pythagoras.
→ State the formula and identify the letters
a² + b² = c² ⇒ where 'a' is 380cm, 'b' is 290cm and 'c' is what we are trying to work out
→ Substitute in the values into the formula
380² + 290² = c²
⇒ Simplify
144400 + 84100 = c²
⇒ Collect the numbers together
228500 = c²
⇒ Square root both sides to find 'c'
478.0167361 = c
→ The length of the diagonal is 478.02
Answer:
Original claim is
Opposite claim is
Null and alternative hypotheses:
Significance level: 0.01
Test statistic:
We can use TI-84 calculator to find the test statistic and P-value. The steps are as follows:
Press STAT and the scroll right to TESTS
Scroll down to 2-SampTTest... and scroll to stats.
Enter below information.
Pooled: Yes
Calculate.
The output is in the attachment.
Therefore, the test statistic is:
P-value: 0.4412
Reject or fail to reject: Fail to reject
Final Conclusion: Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we, therefore, fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the samples are from populations with the same mean.
Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.