1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vesna_86 [32]
3 years ago
8

What is MOST likely the reason the kidnapping of the Lindbergh’s baby was dubbed ‘the crime of the century’? The idea that a bab

y could be taken from their own home was startling. The parents of the baby were famous. The police had never encountered a ransom request before. The baby’s worth was much higher than most children.
Law
1 answer:
IceJOKER [234]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The police had never encountered a ransom request before.

Explanation:

The parents of the baby being aviators and working in the aviation sector made them to be popular.But what actually made it to be dubbed "Crime of the century"was because, there was no request of ransom but rather, the child was killed. This made the congress to pass a federal law against kidnapping.

You might be interested in
All of the following are true about the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) except :
koban [17]
B
23 states have enacted all or part of the UCC as statutes
4 0
3 years ago
Where can you go to have your will notarized and made legal?
julsineya [31]
Answer:A lawyers office
6 0
3 years ago
Question #9
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

The answer is C) 50 feet

7 0
3 years ago
A bank lends money to a family so that it can buy a new house. This lets the family pay for the house over time instead of havin
inysia [295]

Answer:

standard deferred payment

Explanation:

just got it right on quiz

6 0
3 years ago
Who supports judicial restraint?
balu736 [363]

Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.

<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>

A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.

<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>

They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.

Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Emergence of federalism in Nigeria​
    14·1 answer
  • The largest and most prominent collection of law enforcement agencies, including the United States Marshals Service; the Federal
    12·1 answer
  • Seatbelts keeps the force required to stop them smaller.
    14·1 answer
  • students shouldn’t do Those Type of Things To Teachers asking Them out on a date or kissing The school Teacher Touching Them The
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • If two people attempt the same maneuver, what determines the amount of force that each is required to exert?
    14·1 answer
  • What does the Eighth Amendment address?
    7·2 answers
  • What do some police officers have to do to get in the academy?
    8·2 answers
  • Do you agree that incarceration is a better method of correction than corporal punishment?
    11·2 answers
  • Does OSHA provide employees with insurance?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!