All categories

3 years ago

What is 126,234 rounded to the nearest thousand

Mathematics

2 answers:

Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago

6 0

Here u go it is 126,000

Dafna1 [17]3 years ago

4 0

126,000, hope this helps!!

You might be interested in

Use the function values for f and g shown in the table below to evaluate the following expression.

Vikentia [17]

The function f(g(2)) is an illustration of a composite function

The value of f(g(2)) is 2

<h3>How to determine the value of the function f(g(2))?</h3>

Given:

The table of values for functions f(x) and g(x)

To calculate f(g(2)), we start by calculating g(2)

From the table;

g(2) = 6

So, we have:

f(g(2)) = f(6)

From the table;

f(6) = 2

So, we have:

f(g(2)) = 2

Hence, the value of f(g(2)) is 2

Read more about composite functions at:

brainly.com/question/10687170

5 0

2 years ago

Which three lengths could be the lengths

Fed [463]

Given:

The three lengths in the options.

To find:

Which three lengths could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle?

Solution:

If the sum of two smaller sides is greater than the largest side, then the three sides can form a triangle otherwise the triangle is not possible.

In option A, the three sides are 4 cm, 8 cm, 13 cm. Here, the largest side is 13 cm.

Sum of two smaller sides is:

$4+8=12$

$4+8$

So, the triangle is not possible.

In option B, the three sides are 13 cm, 11 cm, 23 cm. Here, the largest side is 23 cm.

Sum of two smaller sides is:

$13+11=24$

$13+11>23$

So, the triangle is possible.

In option C, the three sides are 5 cm, 18 cm, 12 cm. Here, the largest side is 18 cm.

Sum of two smaller sides is:

$5+12=17$

$5+12$

So, the triangle is not possible.

In option D, the three sides are 25 cm, 8 cm, 16 cm. Here, the largest side is 25 cm.

Sum of two smaller sides is:

$8+16=24$

$8+16$

So, the triangle is not possible.

Therefore, the correct option is B. The three lengths 13 cm, 11 cm, 23 cm could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle.

6 0

2 years ago

The pollutant PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl) can affect the thickness of pelican eggshells. Thinking of the thickness, T, of the

gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

The expression f(200) depicts the value of the concentration of the pollutant, which when substituted in the expression T = f(P) will give the value of the thickness of the pelican eggs.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we are given that T = f(P)

Where T = thickness of the eggs

P = concentration in ppm ((parts per million))

Considering f(200) comparing to f(P)

The expression f(200) depicts the value of the concentration of the pollutant, which when substiuted in the expression T = f(P) will give the value of the thickness of the pelican eggs.

i.e substituted the value of the concentration in ppm to get the thickness of the pelican eggs in mm. since the expression shows thickness of pelican eggs as a function of the concentration. for every 200ppm of concentration, the numerical value of the thickness of pelican eggs can be gotten.

6 0

3 years ago

<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%20%2B%201%20%7D%7B2%7D%20%20%3D%20%20%5Cfrac%7B7x%20-%203%7D%7B2%7D%20" id="Tex

MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

$\sf x =\dfrac{2}{3}$