Answer:
Through the newspaper ads.
Explanation:
Personal selling is one of the ways of selling of products by various businesses where the seller and the customers come in direct contact or face to face in order to discuss the features, benefits, and worthiness of any product that the seller is interested in selling This can be done through direct face to face interaction, on telephones, through video conferencing, and also on the internet but not through newspaper ads.
Answer:
The following summarizes the solution to the given problem.
Explanation:
The given values are:
Sales,
= $660,000
Expenses,
= $255,453
Received cash revenues,
= $605,934
(a)
According to the accrual, profits would be acknowledged and therefore not necessarily received on the occasion of purchase.
⇒ 
On substituting the given values, we get
⇒ 
⇒ 
($)
(b)
⇒ 
On substituting the given values, we get
⇒ 
⇒ 
($)
(c)
- The reliable financial foundation again for a financial consultant is more helpful because it demonstrates or represents the organization's appropriate financial status.
- It accepts the profits throughout a similar time frame.
Assuming the user took advantage of this offer, the amount that would be discounted on a $10,000 invoice is: $200.
<h3>
Discounted amount </h3>
Using this formula
Discounted amount =Discount rate× Invoice
Let plug in the formula
Discounted amount=2%×$10,000
Discounted amount=$200
Therefore assuming the user took advantage of this offer, the amount that would be discounted on a $10,000 invoice is: $200.
Learn more about Discounted amount here:brainly.com/question/12965533
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.
Given:
130,500 net pay to employees
19,000 income tax withholding
5,000 FICA withholding
130,500 + 19,000 + 5,000 + 5,000 = 159,500
<span>The total wages and payroll tax expense to the company for this pay period, excluding any unemployment taxes, is $159,500.
</span>
The 5,000 is added twice because the first 5,000 is withheld from the employees salary as the employees share. The employer also has to pay off 5,000 as employer's share to the employee's FICA withholding. Thus, the presence of the 2nd 5,000.
FICA, <span> Federal Insurance Contributions Act,</span> is composed of
1) <span>6.2 % Social Security tax;
2) <span>1.45 % Medicare tax (the “regular” Medicare tax); and
3) 0.9 % of a Medicare surtax starting 2013 for employees earning over $200,000.
</span></span>
