Answer:
Taft-Hartley Act
Explanation:
Taft-Hartley Act is also known as the labour management relations act of 1947 and it restricts the activities and powers of labour unions. It stops unions for engaging in unfair labour practices such as jurisdictional strike, wild strike, political strike, secondary boycotts, and monetary donations to political campaigns.
Robert has violated the Taft-Hartley act by creating a fictional role in the company in order to get his cousin a job.
Answer:
$70
Explanation:
Total revenue from three employees:
= No. of gallons of paint produced × Selling price per gallon
= 40 × $15
= $600
Total revenue from four employees:
= No. of gallons of paint produced × Selling price per gallon
= 48 × $15
= $720
Total revenue created by 4th worker:
= Total revenue from four employees - Total revenue from three employees
= $720 - $600
= $120
Cost of hiring 4th worker = $50 per day
Therefore,
Marginal profit for the fourth employee:
= Total revenue created by 4th worker - Cost of hiring 4th worker
= $120 - $50
= $70
Answer:
d) Contractual non-compliance provisions are broader in scope.
Explanation:
Both common law and civil law were originated in western Europe. Common law comes from medieval England while civil law comes from ancient Roman Empire. Common law is more flexible than civil law, so that allows different interpretations of the law. Since civil law is more rigid, contractual non-compliance provisions must include all possible contingencies and their outcomes.
Answer:
$45.76
Explanation:
Next dividend = Dividend just paid * (1 + Dividend growth rate) = $3.71 * (1 + 0.036) = $3.84356
Using the formula for the dividend discount model, we can calculate he price per share of the company's stock as follows:
Stock price = Next dividend / (Required return - Dividend growth rate) = $3.84356 / (0.12 - 0.036) = $45.76
Therefore, the price per share of the company's stock is $45.76.
The answer is "<u>The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to differences in scientific judgments."</u>
It isn't surprising that as the inquiry proceeds with, researchers at times differ about the bearing in which truth lies. Economists regularly differ for a similar reason. Economics is a youthful science, and there is still much to be educated. Economists here and there differ in light of the fact that they have distinctive hunches about the legitimacy of elective hypotheses or about the extent of critical parameters that measure how monetary factors are connected.
