Answer:
The mode and Median would be lower than the mean.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution data is positively skewed which means that most of the data would be towards the lower side. In this situation the mean is higher than the mode and median. Dr. Hammer has distribution data which is positively skewed so the mode and median will be lower than the mean.
For question 1:
Part i)
2.6 x 2.6 = 6.76 cm squared
No unit conversions needed
Part ii)
1.2 dm = 1.2 / 1000000 = 0.0000012 cm
0.0000012 x 0.0000012 = 0.00000000000144 cm squared
Question 2:
16.5dm = 16.5/ 1000 = 0.0165 m
0.0165 x 0.0165 = 0.00027225 m squared
I hope this has helped
Y = 6
5y = 5 x y
5y = 5 x 6
5y = 30.
It is C. 30.
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck Studying :)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The pediatrician said that the z-score for the boy's height, relative to other 2-year-olds in the country, was 1.59
He explains to the parents of the boy, that the extreme 5% of cases often require special attention.
(A) Does this child fall into that group?
Yes, this child falls into that group. He is among the extreme 5% of cases at the tail of the distribution.
(B) What do you need to assume about the heights of 2-year-olds, in order to find your answer to part (A)?
Assume that the distribution of heights is skewed, the heights are independent of one another, and the number of heights is very large.
6t + 5j= 34
2t + 3j = 16
12t + 10 j = 68
12t + 18j = 96
-8j = -28
j = 3.5
jelly beans= 3.5 and trail mix = 2.75
