Answers:
B. <span>The x-coordinate of point A is 5.
</span>E. <span>Point A is on the x-axis.
</span>
Explanation:
Any point drawn on the coordinates has the general notation of (x,y).
The given point is (5,0). This means that:
The x-coordinate of the point is 5
The y-coordinate of the point is 0
Now, let's check the place of this point.
The x-coordinate of the point is 5. This means that we will move 5 points to the right of the origin on the x-axis
The y-coordinate of the point is 0. This means that we will not move along the y-axis which means that the point stays on the x-axis.
Now, comparing the deduced results with the given choices, we will find that the correct choices are B and E
Hope this helps :)
Let
. Then
and
are two fundamental, linearly independent solution that satisfy
Note that
, so that
. Adding
doesn't change this, since
.
So if we suppose
then substituting
would give
To make sure everything cancels out, multiply the second degree term by
, so that
Then if
, we get
as desired. So one possible ODE would be
(See "Euler-Cauchy equation" for more info)
To be honest, these answer choices are a bit baffling. The best answer in my opinion would be to do at least two of the three options given below.
- Place a price floor above the equilibrium.
- Decrease imports from other countries.
- Reduce current supply (reduce herd sizes).
Doing that should increase the prices.
Placing a floor above equilibrium will force the equilibrium to move upward, and with the reduce in supply from other countries, demand will shift toward the domestic producers. Without the demand shift, there simply would be an oversupply or surplus of dairy. Either the surplus is thrown away or its simply housed somewhere else (often at taxpayer expense).
---------------
If you place a ceiling below equilibrium, then the price will go down to that ceiling value. That will be the highest price possible. This is the opposite of what the farmers want. It gets even worse when you increase milk imports (since supply goes up leading to further reduced prices). So that rules out choice A.
If you place a ceiling above equilibrium, then nothing happens. The price stays at equilibrium. Nothing too exciting here. This rules out choice B (though I agree with the "decrease imports" portion).
If you set a floor below equilibrium, then nothing happens similar to the last paragraph above. The price stays where it is. We can rule out choice C. Reducing herd sizes will reduce supply so that could maybe increase prices.
I'm not really familiar with the term "arbitrage" so I probably won't be any help here. That seems like an answer choice that is a distraction, but I'm not sure.
Answer:
118 ounces
Step-by-step explanation:
1 pound = 16 ounces
7 pounds = 112 ounces
112 + 6 = 118 ounces
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. Combining probabilities is a function of mutually exclusive events. Joint probability<span> is a measure of two events happening at the same time, and can only be applied to situations where more than one observation can be occurred at the same time.</span>
