Answer:
C. The country was already in debt, and Alaska’s climate and terrain were viewed as too cold.
Explanation:
I, got it correct. hope you got it right.
Once a case reaches the Supreme Court, the The Supreme Court itself decides which cases it will hear.
The Supreme Court is asked to review more than 7,000 cases each year, so it would not be possible for the court to hear and make a decision on every case that is sent to it. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100 to 150 cases per year. The vast majority of those cases work their way up to the Supreme Court from lower courts. About two-thirds of the cases come from lower federal court decisions that are appealed for review, and about one-third of the cases are reviewing decisions made by supreme courts of individual states.
There are some cases that can have original jurisdiction at the Supreme Court level -- such as when there is a case between one state government and another or between state governments and the federal government. These are more rare within the overall agenda of the Court.
Answer is: Ralf Gustav Dahrendorf <span>.
</span>Ralf Gustav Dahrendorf<span> (1929 – 2009) was a German-British </span>sociologist and <span>philosopher</span>.
He was expert in class conflict theories and he<span> studied class </span>distribution in modern society. He tried<span> to bring together </span>structural functionalism<span> and Marxism.</span>
It is the motion of particles that creates a form of energy called heat (or thermal) energy that is present in all matter. Tiny particles in solids, liquids and gases are always in motion It is the motion of particles that creates a form of energy called thermal heat that is in all matter.
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>