<span>The most likely hazards you may encounter while participating in camping activities, and what I do to anticipate, help prevent, mitigate, and respond to these hazards are:
One, during campfire session, the students gather around a bonfire and perform activities. This event usually happens at night and sometimes, they may get burned if going too close to it. So to prevent it, a student must be about one meter and a half away from the center of the bonfire since it will expand as its fire spreads throughout the wood stacked.
Two, activities such as mountain hiking. Many of the students fall from the area where they are climbing and so to prevent this, a student must have body harness and proceeds with the right track base on the tracks provided by the organizers to ensure the safety of the student.
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Article One: Minutes that Matter
Article Two: Defeating the Dragons
Information from Article 1 to support the difference: Teens work with companies to raise funds for soldiers over seas.
Information from Article 2 to support the difference:Teens work as EMTs , saving people directly.
PLZ MARK AS BRAINLIEST THANK AND FIVE STAR :)
Answer:
Confederates had small advantages because they were close to home which meant they had quick access to supplies and familiarity of the battlegrounds. BUT OVERALL the industrialized Union possessed an enormous advantage over the Confederacy — they had 20,000 miles of railroad track, more than double the Confederacy’s 9,000 miles. Troops and supplies that were previously dependent on man or horse power could now move easily by rail, making railroads attractive military targets. The Union controlled 70% of the country’s total miles of track and owned 96% of U.S. railroad equipment, which meant it was ideally prepared for damage replacement when bridges, rail rights-of-way or rolling stock were destroyed. This strength was an early indicator of rail’s ability to shape future military strategy.
Explanation:
Hope this helped! Brainiest please if it did
Answer:
Modest short term deterrent, but will need mass executions to be effective
Explanation:
The question has already been answered but I guess you need an explanation.
In the deterrence theory by Professor Land and his colleagues, they assumes that offenders are rational, I.e. they know the law and the penalties attached to defaulting the law..
They're are three points to take note of in this study;
1. For execution to have a deterrent effect, then it means a huge number of execution must have taken place
2. Most of any deterrent effect of execution of homicide occurs immediately after the execution is made public
3. 5 to 10 homicides would deterred in a year if there are 10 to 20 executions using 0.5 homicides deterred on a monthly basis.
The supreme court introduced a two-part test, known as the "Sherbert" test (or balancing test) to determine whether the government was violating an individual's "free exercise" of religion.
The Sherbert test guarantees that government doesn't take unjustified activities that obstruct a man's religious flexibility. The United States court framework has embraced the Sherbert test to decide whether the legislature has fittingly allowed or denied joblessness benefits in light of the job one's religion had in his or her job loss.
The test causes the courts to decide whether the individual's case of having a true religious conviction is exact and if the administration's activities load a man's capacity to follow up on his or her convictions. Moreover, the test requires the administration to decide whether it has acted to the state's advantage and on the off chance that it has done as such in a way that is slightest prohibitive to a man's religion.
