All categories

3 years ago

Adjusting factory overhead LO P4

Business

1 answer:

irga5000 [103]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

26,500 Under applied

Explanation:

<em><u>Lock-Tite Company</u></em>

Actual Factory Overhead 215,000

Factory overhead Indirect materials 15,000

Indirect labor 80,000

Other overhead costs 120,000

Direct Labor = 345,000

Predetermined Overhead = 70% of $ 345,000= $ 241,500

Actual Overhead = $ 215,000

Difference = Predetermined Overhead - Actual Overhead

= 241,500- $ 215,000= 26,500 Under applied

We find the difference between actual overhead and applied overhead to find the underapplied ( overapplied overhead. If the actual overhead is less than applied overhead it is underapplied. But if the actual overhead is greater than applied overhead it is over applied.

Raw materials Opening $ 43,000

Add Materials Purchases 195000 ( 210,000 - 15000)

Less Raw materials Closing $ 52,000

Direct Materials Used 186,000

Direct Labor 345,000

FOH 215,000

Total Manufacturing Costs 746,000

Add Work in process Opening 10,200

Less Work in process Closing 21,300

Add Finished goods Opening 63,000

Less Finished goods Closing 35,600

Cost Of Goods Sold 762,300

You might be interested in

Clam gulch is a very popular clamming beach in alaska. on good low tides, clammers can easily gather 60 clams (the state limit).

Ahat [919]

The way economists would probably explain the wastage of this clam resource is by saying that clams are free goods and are therefore subject to the tragedy of the commons effect. The tragedy of the commons effect is a theory in economics, postulated by the Victorian economist William Forster Lloyd.

The tragedy of the commons effect describes a condition within a shared-resource system where each user act freely according to their own self-interest, but their collective actions ends in the depletion or spoilage of that resource, thus having a negative impact on the common good of all users. In this case, commons is taken to refer to the clam resources.

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose that the price of basketball tickets at your college is determined by market forces. Currently, the demand and supply sc

belka [17]

Answer:

a) see attached graph. There is nothing unusual with the supply curve, it is simply fixed. This happens to most services, e.g. there is a fixed number of hotel rooms available for rent, in the short run you cannot add more rooms per night if the demand increases. In order to increase the quantity supplied, you would need to build a larger hotel, or in this case, a larger stadium.

b) the equilibrium price is $8 and the equilibrium quantity is 8,000 tickets

c) if the college plans to increase enrollment, the demand might increase, leading to a higher equilibrium price, but the supply will remain the same until the stadium is expanded.

Explanation:

Price Quantity Demanded (Qd) Quantity Supplied (Qs)

$4 10,000 8,000

$8 8,000 8,000

$12 6,000 8,000

$16 4,000 8,000

$20 2,000 8,000

3 0

3 years ago

The business arrangement in the newspaper industry in which two separately owned papers in the same city are permitted to combin

musickatia [10]

Answer: Joint operating agreement

Explanation:

The joint operating agreement is one of the concept that helps in protecting the business or the industry from the failure that helps in governing the partnership between any two organization.

In this type of agreement any two organization are basically contributing their power and the resources for producing the effective result.

According to the given question, the newspaper industry is one of the example of joint operating agreement in which two companies are permitted for combining their business. Therefore, Joint operating agreement is the correct answer.

8 0

3 years ago

If $360 is invested at an interest rate of 4% per year and is compounded quarterly, how much will the investment be worth in 18

love history [14]

The answer is $736.96
formula W=p(1+i/q) *(qy)
where p=360 , y=18 (years) , i-0.04 , q=4 (quarterly compounding)
W=360(1+.01)*72
=360*2.0471

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Do you think it is easier to increase or decrease government spending

Anna35 [415]

It is much easier to increase government spending, because it gives a temporary boost, whereas decreasing it would take away the benefits you had before, and might mess up other "things" that relied on that part you just removed to decrease government spending.

4 0

3 years ago