Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Inflation rate= 7%
Real rate of return= 10%
Present value (PV)= $10,000
Number of periods (n)= 10 years
<u>The real rate of return incorporates the effect of the inflation rate. Therefore, the nominal rate of return:</u>
Nominal rate of return= 0.1 + 0.07= 17%
<u>To calculate the Future Value, we need to use the following formula:</u>
FV= PV*(1 + i)^n
FV= 10,000*(1.17^10)
FV= $48,068.28
This is the n<u>ominal valu</u>e received after ten years.
<u>If Sally wants to determine the real value of the investment after 10 years, we must use the real rate of return:</u>
<u></u>
FV= 10,000*(1.1^10)
FV=$25,937.42
Answer:
net income increased by $1,537.50
Explanation:
Obviously, the original income statement is missing, so I looked for a similar question:
sales revenue $16,500
COGS <u>($9,300)</u>
Gross profit $7,200
Operating exp.:
- Administrative $950
- Depreciation $1,300
- Shipping $412.50 <u>($2,662.50)</u>
Net income $4,537.50
net income increased by $4,537.50 - $3,000 = $1,537.50
Excise taxes tend to<span> increase prices.</span>
Answer: Yes
Explanation: In the above case, a quasi-contract was formed. This is when a bilateral contract is not in place but one party will enjoy the benefit of the activities of the other party and may be enriched by it.
A bilateral agreement is the exchange of a promise for another and in this case would have been, the promise that Dozier would pay for Paschall’s work. This was not established, however, Dozier will benefit from Paschall’s work unduly if he does not pay for the improvements. The law holds that he has to pay for Paschall’s work to prevent being unjustly enriched.
