Answer and Explanation:
"The Skin I'm In" is a story about racism, prejudice, bulling, insecurity, white supremacy, impunity, self-esteem, support, sense of belonging and self-expression. The author uses Maleeka's life and all the problems related to it and its appearance to portray such important themes that are more present in reality than what we imagine.
In relation to these themes, I do not believe that the author should modify the end of the story, or even change the end of the characters. In order to achieve the objectives of the narrative and present all these themes in a realistic way, it is necessary that each character has the ending that he had. Especially Maleeka, who presents with her mistakes, embraces her own personality and speaks the truth about the things that are happening to her, without protecting anyone out of fear or the need for friendship.
The end of each character represents the end that each archetype they represent must be in real life, so the story is identifiable and personal for all those who read it.
The person above me is correct mark brainliest !!!!
The voices or speakers used by authors when they seemingly speak for themselves in a book. The use of this term makes it
clear in critical discussion that the narration or presentation of a story is not necessarily to be identified with the biographical
and historical author. Instead, the authorial voice may be another fiction created by the author. It is often considered poor
form for a modern literary critic to equate the authorial voice with the historical author, but this practice was common in the
nineteenth century. In fact, it is naive to assume that the authorial voice is a "real" representation of the historical author.
