The linked answer is wrong because that integral gives you the net displacement of the object, not the total distance.
To get the distance, you have to integrate the speed (as opposed to velocity), which involves integrating the absolute value of the velocity function.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8988c/8988ca8b2dd94a11a2a14a0fed494d55ce260db3" alt="\mathrm{distance} = \displaystyle\int_1^5 |\sin(t)| \,\mathrm dt"
By definition of absolute value,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b1d8/1b1d80839c75ffd57e2aa7a1ba66ebfdf423ea67" alt="|\sin(t)|=\begin{cases}\sin(t)&\text{for }\sin(t)\ge0\\-\sin(t)&\text{for }\sin(t)"
Over this particular integration interval,
• sin(<em>t</em> ) ≥ 0 for 1 ≤ <em>t</em> < <em>π</em>, and
• sin(<em>t</em> ) < 0 for <em>π</em> < <em>t</em> ≤ 5
so you end up splitting the integral at <em>t</em> = <em>π</em> as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aaf5/9aaf5ec39ecbe48586a1f4e2349ecffd58c2a23f" alt="\mathrm{distance} = \displaystyle\int_1^\pi \sin(t)\,\mathrm dt + \int_\pi^5 (-\sin(t))\,\mathrm dt"
Now compute the distance:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27916/27916c7edb82d5697551600415a3cf40753c5728" alt="\mathrm{distance} = -\cos(t)\bigg|_1^\pi + \cos(t)\bigg|_\pi^5"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e445b/e445b754bcf21be2558d23857733ea0e19810693" alt="\mathrm{distance} = -(\cos(\pi) - \cos(1)) + (\cos(5) - \cos(\pi))"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33c18/33c18ec05916114aa26e94af78fe5b1c85b1b9ba" alt="\mathrm{distance} = -2\cos(\pi) + \cos(1) + \cos(5) \approx 2.82"
making B the correct answer.
Answer:
B. 5.00
Step-by-step explanation:
:)
Your answer would be 4, because the equation for the circumference of a circle is π × diameter, so if you have 4 × π as the circumference, then 4 is the diameter.
I hope this helps!
To find the GCF of the two terms, continuous division must be done.
What can be used to divide both terms such that there is not a remainder?
Start small, let's take 2. It could be a GCF.
Move up higher, say 3. Yes, it can be a GCF.
To see if there might be a greater common factor, divide the constants by 3.
48/3 = 16
81/3 = 27
Upon inspection and contemplation, there is no more common factor between 16 and 27. So, 3 is the GCF.
Moving on, when it comes to variables. The variable with the least exponents is easily the GCF. For the variable m, the GCF is m2 and for n, the GCF is n.
Combining the three, we have the overall GCF = 3m2n
Answer:(47/8, 2621/4)
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the formula x= -b/2a to find the maximum and minimum