Answer:
If we find out that technology has shifted the labor demand to the left, this is a disadvantage to labor.
Explanation:
To begin with, It's important to properly understand the concept of Marginal Product of Labour.
In simple terms, marginal product of labor is basically the change in unit output occasioned by a unit change in labor. There are a number of factors that may cause a marginal change in labor. Suffix to say, marginal change can either be to the right or to the left.
To narrow it down, we have technology to consider as one of the factors that ensue marginal change. Even more, this change can either be to the right or left. That is, an increase in technology might result to an increase in unit labour - this is to the right. And this is beneficial or advantageous to labor. In same vein, a increase in technology might result to a decrease in unit labour - this is to the left. And this is disadvantageous to labor.
It's on established record that introduction of new technologies, procedures and processes often have a direct effect on an individual employee. This altogether affects the marginal product in labour.
Hence, when technology brings changes to the left, this is a disadvantage to labour, as there is possibly a downsizing or reduction in labor strengths occasioned by the new technologies.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Your question should be complete with details. I managed to check from other sources the details and the complete question:
below is the solution:
<span>$175,000 - $110,000 DL = $65,000</span>
Answer:
-He should wait until his last year in high school to fill out the FAFSA.
-He should start saving right away. It is never too early to start a savings account.
-He should work hard throughout middle school and high school or it might be too difficult for him to excel later, since bad habits are hard to break.
-He should try different sports and clubs in middle school and early high school. Then he should pick his favorites and invest more time in them.
Explanation:
A likely result will be a decrease in the quality of a product.
The fee ceiling is a state of affairs while the price charged is greater than or less than the equilibrium fee decided with the aid of market forces of demand and deliver. It's been found that higher price ceilings are useless. price ceiling has been discovered to be of extraordinary importance within the residence rent marketplace.
A price ceiling is a legal maximum rate that one will pay for some good or carrier. A government imposes rate ceilings as a good way to preserve the price of some necessary precise or services low-cost. as an example, in 2005 at some stage after Hurricane Katrina, the price of bottled water expanded above $five according to the gallon.
A rate ceiling continues a fee from growing above a sure level (the “ceiling”), even as a fee ground continues a rate from falling underneath a given degree (the “ground”). This phase uses the call for and delivers a framework to research price ceilings. the following section discusses rate flooring.
Learn more about the price ceiling here brainly.com/question/1448982
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is Option C
Explanation:
Any event that would either decrease the demand for loanable funds or increase the supply of loanable funds will decrease the equilibrium interest rates. Supply of loanable funds is affect by the amount of national savings. National savings in turn, is the sum of private savings, public saving and net capital inflow.
In option C, capital inflows are increasing. This means that there would be an excess supply of money in the economy which can be converted into loanable funds. This would, therefore, push the supply curve to the right thereby reducing the real interest rate equilibrium.