If an archaeologist discovers new evidence suggesting that humans inhabited an area before it was believed to have been inhabited, the archaeologist must first critically evaluate the work of other archaeologists who argue otherwise.
In this way, the archaeologist would be able to find points of agreement and disagreement in research already carried out to proceed with his study and then carry out additional tests on the evidence found.
<h3 /><h3>Importance of the scientific method</h3>
The scientific method is a set of rules that must be followed to produce proven scientific knowledge. Therefore, the method provides value and reliability to the research, protecting the researcher's subjectivity.
Therefore, when discovering new evidence about a topic, a researcher must critically evaluate the scientific material already produced to carry out new tests to prove its evidence.
The correct answer is:
- First critically evaluate the work of other archaeologists who argue otherwise.
Find out more information about scientific method here:
brainly.com/question/17216882
I don't think this is true.
A good mental health is not about not having an emotional problems (this can't be prevented, for example sadness due to a death of a close person can't be prevented and might serve a purpose of leading to acceptance), but about being able to deal with them without falling into serious disorders.
Answer:
It's an international border...
Explanation:
The border was an established agreement between the U.S. and Britain
The treaty between the U.S. and Britain, established the 49th parallel from the Rocky Mountains to the Strait of Georgia; this is the boundary between the U.S. and Canada.
This agreement took place in 1818.
tbh I'm kinda confused by what you're asking
I hope what I put answers your question tho
<u>The optimality condition in the consumer's choice between two goods is the following</u>
<u></u>
The ratio of the marginal utilities is called the Marginal Rate of Substitution between goods x and y, and it arises from the preferences of the consumer towards the two goods. The MRS establishes the rate at which this consumer can give up a certain quantity of good x in exchange for another amount good y, while maintaining the same level of utility (it establishes the units of good x that would satisfy the consumer if he had to reject a certain number of units of y, given his personal preferences).
When MRS is equaled to the price ratio, it allows to calculate the bundle of goods x and y, that provides the maximum utility to this consumer given the market prices of x and y, which means that t<u>he solution provides the highest-utility bundle that he can afford. </u>
<u>If the rule does not hold, the choice might be either suboptimal or impossible.</u> When the result is suboptimal, the consumer acquires a bundle that he can afford but that is not the one yielding the maximum utility. If the result obtained is impossible, the consumer cannot afford the bundle, even tough it yields very high utility to him.