<span><span>1Berlin , Berlin3,426,354</span><span>2
Hamburg , Hamburg1,739,117</span><span>3
Munich , Bavaria1,260,391</span><span>4
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia<span>963,39
hope this helps :D</span></span></span>
Answer:
Whitney's invention made upland short cotton into a profitable crop, which strengthened the economic foundation of slavery in the United States. Despite the social and economic impact of his invention, Whitney lost many profits in legal battles over patent infringement for the cotton gin.
Explanation:
Correct answer: on the basis of the age of sitting judges.
Context/explanation:
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was eager to implement his New Deal programs as an antidote to the Great Depression. However, the US Supreme Court had already ruled that some provisions of the New Deal were unconstitutional, because they took too much power into the hands of the federal government, especially the executive branch of the federal government. So, riding the momentum of his landslide reelection victory in 1936, in February of 1937, FDR proposed a plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges. The plan offered to provide full pay to justices over age 70 who would retire. If the older justices didn't retire, assistant justices (with full voting rights) would be appointed to sit with those existing justices. This was a way FDR hoped to give the court a liberal majority that would side with his programs.
As it turned out, before FDR's proposal came up for a vote in Congress, two of the sitting justices came over to his side of the argument, and the Supreme Court narrowly approved as constitutional both the Social Security Act and the National Labor Relations Act. So his plan (which failed in the US Senate) became unnecessary to his purposes.
Roosevelt's "court-packing" scheme was unpopular. It was seen as an attempt to take away the independence of the judicial branch of government.
Question 1: The disparity has always been that ever since women have been allowed to work, they were not viewed as capable enough to efficiently do the same jobs men can do and thus people who employed women would pay them significantly less to do the same job a man is doing. Even through all the controversy that has happened over time, many professions still pay women much less than they deserve for doing the same job.
Question 2: The relationship between professions and gender is one that is considered rarely (if at all) theorized in the sociology discipline. However, there are quite a few studies (many of them ongoing) that are attempting to set a value to what the relationship may be.
I'm really sorry. I would love to help you, but I am having a hard time comprehending your question.
