Answer:
The correct answer is $65.90 (approx.)
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:
Dividend paid = $8.50
Increase dividend = $6.50 per year
Require return = 16%
We can calculate the current share price by using following method:
=[($8.5 + $6.5) ÷ (1 + 16%)^1] + [($8.5 + $6.5 + $6.5) ÷ ( 1 + 16%)^2] +[($8.5 + $6.5 + $6.5 + $6.5) ÷ (1+16%)^3] + [($8.5 + $6.5+ $6.5 + $6.5 + $6.5) ÷ (1+16%)^4
= $15 ÷ 1.16 + $21.5 ÷ 1.16^2 + 28 ÷ 1.16^3 + 34.5 ÷ 1.16^4
= $65.90 (approx.)
Answer:tortious interference
Explanation:
tortious interference is a law term that comes to mind when there is a breach of contract resulting from the competitor's actions. Tortious interference in Tort law(an area of law) deals with the situation in which there is damage to property emanating from intentional or negligent acts of the defendant, in this case the competitor in business. In which case the actions(competitive behaviour) of defendant is not justifiable and permissible and simultaneously breaches contract of plaintiff, it becomes tortious interference.
The amount of the salvage may be calculated using various equations. We are given that the sound tracker is retired about some time and this was initially bought at $41,000. However, we are given that the accumulated depreciation is also equal to $41,000.
Since the initial payment is similar to the accumulated depreciation hence, the salvage value is zero.
Answer:
D) Income inequality should be minimized in a developed society.
Explanation:
Normative statements express value-based judgement on how a situation should be . In the instance aboce, it is the author's opinion that in developed society income inequality should be minimised.
Positive statements are more descriptive using facts to make statements. In the above Carla will get more excercise at the fair than at the movies is a fact-based statement.
