1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ahat [919]
3 years ago
14

When are objects immoral, and when is it right or wrong to possess them? Does historic value supersede offensiveness?

History
1 answer:
alukav5142 [94]3 years ago
7 0

They are immoral when the general values are violated. The material object, on which an action rests, can be of good or bad character from the moral. An object can be good or bad in the reason of the rules, the situation that is presented, or the intention or actions. In another sense, an object of a morally good nature can, in some circumstance, become, in a work of the situation, an immoral object.

Morality depends not only on the common parts of the object, but also on the relationships that are kept with the values, which allow us to act correctly before other human beings.

The historical value overcomes the offensive and transmits an essence of special respect to the respective object. Because it is of a spiritual nature, what gives it a special value in relation to things identical, but not linked to the historical event.

You might be interested in
(the fundamental orders of Connecticut) what reasons do the writers give for forming a government?
deff fn [24]

Answer:

The writers of the constitution wanted a new plan of government because they felt the old plan gave too much power to the states and allowed too much democracy. They fixed these problems in the document that we now call the Constitution

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which british scientist wrote about the passing on of traits that results from the struggle for limited resources in his book th
Olin [163]
The person who wrote the book the origin species is ::::Charles Darwin::::
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The comitatus was a bond between a king and his nobles (called thegns).<br> a. True<br> b. False
koban [17]
Yes it is absolutely true that the Comitatus was a bond between a king and his nobles (called Thegns). The correct option among the two options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a". The word comitatus actually comes from the word committee and it means gathering together and discussing as well as instructing the subordinates.
8 0
3 years ago
And also this one thank you so much!
son4ous [18]

Answer:

I believe the answer is G but i might be wrong

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Help pls this is due today!!!
Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

I just joined this...

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why do members of Congress believe that casework is important?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the senate's vote of censure against McCarthy?
    10·2 answers
  • The term subsistence farming is best defined as
    14·2 answers
  • Adolph hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Josef Stalin could all be classified as
    14·1 answer
  • What does Klemperer suggest about how most Germans felt about Hitler in 1938
    7·1 answer
  • Most enslaved people in the south maintained their family histories by
    13·2 answers
  • When the soviet Soldiers liberated auschwitz death camp, how many shoes did they find 
    12·1 answer
  • How did mass production affect consumers?
    12·1 answer
  • The idea that state governments are empowered to try things out on their own that
    12·1 answer
  • "For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us...."
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!