All categories

3 years ago

Explain the hierarchy of controls in risk management and how you would use these control measures.

Business

1 answer:

Serga [27]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Hierarchy of hazard control is a system used in industry to minimize or eliminate exposure to hazards. It is a widely accepted system promoted by numerous safety organizations. This concept is taught to managers in industry, to be promoted as standard practice in the workplace.

Explanation:

five rungs of the Hierarchy of Controls: elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative controls and personal protective equipment. The hierarchy is arranged beginning with the most effective controls and proceeds to the least effective.

You might be interested in

Which of the following is NOT a step in the strategic planning process?A) defining the company missionB) setting company objecti

Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

Which of the following is NOT a step in the strategic planning process?

E) evaluating all members of the value chain

Explanation:

Strategic planning is an organization's process of defining its strategy, or direction, and making decisions on allocating its resources to pursue this strategy. It may also extend to control mechanisms for guiding the implementation of the strategy

4 0

3 years ago

Edington Electronics Inc. produces and sells two models of pocket calculators, XQ-103 and XQ-104. The calculators sell for $14 a

iren2701 [21]

Answer:

In the question, we are not given information with respect to sales costs, so we can only find total gross sales:

Sales Budget fist 2 quarters of the year

Product Sales Price Sales Q1 Sales Q2 Total gross sales

XQ-103 $14 22,590 27,710 $704,200

XQ-104 $27 14,880 16,200 $839,160

$1,53,360

4 0

3 years ago

VI. Here we consider the paradox of saving one last time in the context of the AS-AD model. Suppose the economy begins with outp

Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

The solution to this question can be defined as follows:

Explanation:

In point a:

When consumer interest decreases, => consumers begin and save less and more, => MPC decreases; => the "IS" curve becomes flatter; => "IS" turns inside. Currently, 'AD' shows together all the goods and financial sector, => as the 'IS' curve adjusts inside the industry, => the 'AD' would also change to the left.

In point b:

Take into account the SR models of "IS-LM" and "AD-AS."

Therefore there is the case of a full job only at the beginning; => its optimum between "IS1" and "LM" in the "IS-LM" model; as well as the main equilibrium among "AD1" and "AS" in the "AD-AS" model "E1'," => the original equilibrium among "Y=Yf," "r=r1" and "P=P1." That now the consumer is reducing the confidence, => the 'IS' curve becomes shifting IMEI 'IS2,' => provided the 'LM' curve, that new balance is 'E2.' That's why the price in the SR is calculated, the AS will change =>, however, the AD also will shift the "AD2" side and "E2'" will become the equilibrium point in the "AD-AS" system, "r=r2 <r1" and "P=P1" throughout the new "Y=Y2 <Yf" balance.

Please find the graph file in the attachment.

6 0

2 years ago

To create meaningful on social media content that will resonate with audiences, businesses engage in ______________, which is th

Margaret [11]

Answer:

I think the answer ought to be B. Social listening

Explanation:

By definition social listening is Social media measurement, 'social media monitoring' or social listening is a way of computing popularity of a brand or company by extracting information from social media channels. So that seems to be the best fit.

5 0

3 years ago

Kenseth Corp. has the following beginning-of-the-year present values for its projected benefit obligation and market-related val

levacccp [35]

Answer:

10%Corridor

2011 $0

2012 $250,000

2013 $295,000

2014 $360,000

Accumulated

2011 $0

2012 $280,000

2013 $367,000

2014 $372,000

Minimum Amortization of Loss

2011 $0

2012 $3,000

2013 $6,000

2014 $1,000

Explanation:

Calculation to determine the net gain or loss amortized and charged to pension expense under the corridor approach

Year, Projected Benefit Obligation (a) , Plan Assets, 10%Corridor, Accumulated d OCI (G/L) (a), Minimum Amortization of Loss

2011 $2,000,000 $1,900,000 $200,000 $ 0 $0

2012 $2,400,000 $2,500,000 $250,000 $280,000 $3,000(b)

2013 $2,950,000 $2,600,000 $295,000 $367,000(c) $6,000(d)

2014 $3,600,000 $3,000,000 $360,000 372,000(e) $1,000(f)

Calculation for 10%Corridor

2011 $0

2012 10%*$2,500,000 =$250,000

2013 10%*$2,950,000 =$295,000

2014 10%*$3,600,000 =$360,000

Calculation for Accumulated Depreciation and Minimum Amortization of Loss

a. As at the beginning of the year

b. ($280,000 – $250,000) ÷ 10 years = $3,000

c. $280,000 – $3,000 + $90,000 = $367,000

d. ($367,000 – $295,000) ÷ 12 years = $6,000

e. $367,000 – $6,000 + $11,000 = $372,000

f ($372,000 – $360,000) ÷ 12 years = $1,000

Therefore the net gain or loss amortized and charged to pension expense under the corridor approach are :

10%Corridor

2011 $0

2012 $250,000

2013 $295,000

2014 $360,000

Accumulated Depreciation

2011 $0

2012 $280,000

2013 $367,000

2014 $372,000

Minimum Amortization of Loss

2011 $0

2012 $3,000

2013 $6,000

2014 $1,000

6 0

2 years ago