1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fiasKO [112]
3 years ago
8

Please help if you can!

Mathematics
1 answer:
Mama L [17]3 years ago
4 0
I hope you don't mind if I don't tell you the answer right away. But, if you're still having trouble I could tell you the answer and show you how I got it step by step.

Anywho, this problem can be solved two ways.

Option 1. Turn the fractions into decimals
In my opinion and experience, I think this is the easiest way to approach a problem like this when it has fractions. To change a fraction into a decimal you would have to divide the denominator by the numerator.

So let's take 1/4 for instance. Put the denominator, 4, in the inside of the tent (I don't know what you call the division thingy I call it a tent cause it looks like it) and put the 1, the numerator, on the outside. Since 4 can't go into 1, you have to put in a decimal point and write in a 0 so 1 becomes 1.0 and the top of the tent should have a decimal point too. Now you can divide 4 by 1(.)0 which will become 0.25. 3/2 can be turn in a decimal in a similar way.

After you turn the two fractions into decimals, you can solve this equation more easily. It doesn't matter whether you subtract 1.5n from 0.25n or visa versa. Just remember what you do to one side you have to do to the other. So if you subtract 1.5n from itself (1.5n-1.5n which cancels it out), you have to then do the same on the other side(1.5n-0.25n)

Now that you have only one n, the problem should be much easier to solve. Just solve for n and you'll get your answer. d=(´▽`)=b

Option 2. Change one fraction's denominator then solve
This method I just discovered how to do. My teacher did teach a method how to actually solve equations with fractions without turning them into decimals, but that was WAY too confusing, so after solving this problem and thinking about it I found a much better way.

Change one of the fraction's denominator so it is the same as the other. Let's take 3/2n as it is quick and easy to do. The denominator for 3/2 has to be the same as 1/4n's denominator, 4.

Forget the n for a minute. You have multiply 3/2 with a fraction (always the numerator and denominator number are the same) that will turn the denominator from 2 to 4. I multiplied 3/2 by 2/2 and got 6/4 thus the denominator is now the same as the 1/4's denominator. Now plug the number back the equation with the n and it will become 1/4n+5=6/4n-10 . Now can solve this much easier.

Remember it doesn't matter if you subtract 1/4n from itself or 6/4n from itself just do the same on the the other side. I subtracted 1/4n from itself and then subtracted 1/4n from 6/4n. Next solve for n.

There is going to be a part where you have to divide a fraction by a fraction. Remember that in order to do that you have to switch the second fraction( so the numerator become the denominator and the denominator becomes the numerator) and multiply. For example (this is unrelated to the problem), (2/4)/(2/4). Flip the second fraction's denominator and numerator so it becomes 4/2. Multiply that by 2/4 and you'll get 8/8 which is basically 1.

Once you get past that part, you have the answer ≧ω≦

Hints to help you out:
*The answer is not a fraction
*DON'T forget to simply the final fraction (after you divide)
*Plug the answer for n back into the equation and solve. If both equations have the same answer then it your answer for n is right, if not you made a mistake
*Watch your signs and operations
*I kinda gave away the decimal version of 3/2 in my explanation

I hope this helps and I didn't complicate the explanation. Again if you still need help and just can't figure out the answer, message me and I'll show/tell you step by step of how I got the answer.

You might be interested in
What is the equation of the graphed line?
Ludmilka [50]
-7+3/6+6=-4/12= -1/4
y+3= -1/4(x+6)
y+3= -1/4x-3/2
y=-1/4x-9/2
7 0
3 years ago
One week, Steph worked 20 hours, Marco
garik1379 [7]

Answer: 9

Step-by-step explanation:

Add 20, 12, and 32 together then divide by 7 because it says "One week" and a week is 7 days. So, it should be like 20 +12 + 32= 64

64 / (divided by) 7 = 9

4 0
2 years ago
What's 76 divided by 9 equals something or 9 / 76 equals something what's the answer easy one
zzz [600]
The answer is 76 divided by 9 equals 8.44
4 0
3 years ago
Divide. (3 3/4 )÷(−2 1/2 ) Enter your answer as a mixed number, in simplified form, in the box.
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

-11/14

Step-by-step explanation:  first you divide 33/4 and (-21/2), then reduce the numbers to -33/4 times 2/21 after you reduce both fractions multiply -11/2 times 1/7 and you get -11/14 your alternative form would br -0.785714


8 0
3 years ago
What is the equation of this line in slope-intercept form?
Ksenya-84 [330]
A is your answer. Hope this helps you!

If I'm right, please mark Brainliest!

-Belle
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A pizza maker averages making 14 pizzas per hour. At this rate, how many hours will it take until he’s made 840 pizzas?
    8·1 answer
  • I need help with these two problems please
    14·1 answer
  • Hi so in Algebra were learning about factoring by greatest common factor.
    14·1 answer
  • How many centimeters equal 9 meters
    10·1 answer
  • Is (-3, -5) a solution of the graph inequality?
    11·2 answers
  • if <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=h%28x%29%3D4x%5E%7B2%7D%20-16" id="TexFormula1" title="h(x)=4x^{2} -16" alt="h(x)=4x^{2} -1
    11·1 answer
  • Expand the following 3(x+9) 4(x-1) 5(5x+2) 8(3x-y)
    14·1 answer
  • Combine these things :/ 5 Times Sqrt 27 - 17 Times Sqrt 3<br><br> Please explain and thank you :P
    9·1 answer
  • Least to greatest 3.2,3.02,3.002,3.03,3.032
    11·1 answer
  • if you vertically stretch the absolute value parent function, f(x)=IxI, by a factor of 3, which of these equations is the new fu
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!