Answer: Only Tech B is correct.
Explanation:
First, tech A is wrong.
The circuits that can be compared with links in a chain are the series circuit, and it can be related to the links in a chain because if one of the elements breaks, the current can not flow furthermore (because the elements in the circuit are connected in series) while in a parallel circuit if one of the branches breaks, the current still can flow by other branches.
Also in a parallel circuit, the sum of the currents of each path is equal to the current that comes from the source, so Tech B is correct, the total current is equal to the sum of the currents flowing in each branch of the circuit.
The wingspan is the biggest that mesures 6.6 in cm so 6.6cm>6cm.
Answer:
All the observers are correct.
Explanation:
This is simply a problem of reference frames from which the motion of the book is being viewed by the various observers.
From their various reference frames, they are all correct.
Observer A must be in the inertial reference frame.
<em>Observers who can explain the behavior of the book and the car by using the relationship between the sum of the forces and changing velocity are said to be observers in inertial reference frames.</em>
This is clearly shown by what observer A noticed. There was a relative motion between the book and the car as she pointed out, making her to be in an inertial reference frame.
<em>Similarly, observers in inertial reference frames can also explain the changes in velocity of objects by considering the forces exerted on them by other objects.</em>
This is shown by observer B as he is able to notice how the force of the car affects the velocity of the book.
Observer C is actually in a non-inertial reference frame, as newtons law of force motion relationship are no longer observed. This occurs in the non inertial reference frame.
Answer:
C. precipitation
Explanation:
if clouds store too much water from evaporation, it will rain which is precipitation