Answer:
Pros: it allows for interest group who represent a small group of people to have a say in legislation with enough funds.
It allows politicians become aware of certain issues with small groups of people within their region which they represent.
It can be free to participate for the individual in an interest group, or a small yearly fee.
Cons: Based on the needs of the minority party, since the majority does not need more votes to pass legislation, they technically do not need lobbyists.
It can only be effective for specific groups, lobbying costs money, the more resources the more lobbying power you have.
Lobbying is considered nearly borderline illegal by most, since sometimes interest groups make donations to a politicians campaign
A magazine would be infact, considered a secondary source! Hope that helps!
The following statements explains what happened during the Haymarket Square incident,
- "Public fear of anarchists and foreigners led to false accusations"
- "Rally leaders were illegally arrested and convicted"
- "A peaceful labor rally ended with a bomb exploding"
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Haymarket Affair (otherwise called the Haymarket Massacre, Haymarket Riot, or Haymarket Square Riot) was the fallout of a bombing that occurred at a work exhibition on May 4, 1886, at Haymarket Square in Chicago.
The rally started on 4th May and Albert Parsons, August Spies, and Samuel Fielden addressed the crowd who gathered for a peaceful negotiation of the worker's rights estimated from 600 to 3,000 in a open wagon near square on Des Plaines Street.
After the rally started, police arrived in group at around 10.30 pm and ordered the crowd rallying to disperse. Home-made bomb filled with dynamite was thrown in the path of the police coming towards them. At once after the bombing, gunshots were exchanged.
Arrest and conviction:
- 8 agitators were accused of plotting and doing the shelling (despite the fact that proof against them was powerless)
- 4 were hung, 1 self-murdered in jail, 3 were detained until John Peter Altgeld drove their sentences in 1893
The U.S. justified its involvement in the Vietnam War by stating that they were fighting against communism. At the time, the Soviet Union was seen as a huge threat and there was a rivalry between the two nations.
