Answer:
P2 affirms P1 and the conclusion is in the same direction.
P1--->P2--->C
This argument is valid.
Step-by-step explanation: using the syllogism rules.
Premises 1 (P1) = Some foreign emissaries are persons without diplomatic immunity,
Premises 2 (P2) = so some persons invulnerable to arrest and prosecution are foreign emissaries
Conclusion (C) = because no persons with diplomatic immunity are persons vulnerable to arrest and prosecution.
From the argument:
P1 uses "some", that means it's not "all" foreign emissaries person that does not have diplomatic immunity. This means that some other foreign emissaries have diplomatic immunity
P2 uses "some", that means it's affirms to that part of P1 which states that some foreign emissaries have diplomatic immunity.
The conclusion is valid because the part of P2 which states that some foreign emissaries are vulnerable to arrest, which affirms with P1 which states that Some foreign emissaries are persons without diplomatic immunity. That means no persons with diplomatic immunity are persons vulnerable to arrest and prosecution. This conclusion literally means that if you don't have diplomatic immunity, you are vulnerable to arrest and prosecution.
Therefore;
P2 affirms P1 and the conclusion is in the same direction.
P1--->P2--->C
This argument is valid.
Hey there! :)
Answer:
Choice D. V = 2184 in³.
Step-by-step explanation:
Recall that to find the volume of a rectangular prism, the following formula is used:
V = l × w × h
Plug in the given dimensions into the formula to solve for the volume:
V = 14 × 13 × 12
Multiply:
V = 2184 in³. The correct answer is D.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation: He add 16 together you are not suppose to add 16 you are suppose to add 5 together so instead of 16 + 16 you do 16+ 5
For every (2) red paint added, (1) blue paint is added
Answer: Jumoke is currently 16 and Aminata is currently 8
Step-by-step explanation:
Could I get brainiest please? its free :D
