The expected average rate of return in the fixed asset above is 36.92%. The rate of return is the income or loss of a proposed investment in a specified amount of time. In this case, a company wants to buy a 4-year life fixed asset which can increase the company's income by $240,000. We can calculate the rate of return by dividing the net income from the investment with the proposed investment to obtain the portion of return received from the investment<span>. Formula: (Net Income From The Investment/Proposed Investment) x 100%.</span>
Answer:
D) The extra energy benefits Patrick gets from another can are no longer worth the cost. MB/MC (S)
Explanation:
The optimal quantity for Patrick to consume is 5 cans of GreenCow.
This is the quantity where MARGINAL BENEFIT EQUALS MARGINAL COST. For all quantities up to the 5th, the marginal benefit is higher than the marginal cost. This means that Patrick's net benefit is increasing, and consuming all units up to this point make him better off.
If Patrick were to consume any more than 5 cans of GreenCow, the cost of each additional can would be higher than the additional benefit (because the marginal cost curve is higher than the marginal benefit curve). Consuming any cans beyond the 5th, therefore, makes him worse off.
Answer:
C, they analyze police reports about crimes reported by victims
Explanation:
Option A is wrong because is disregard hard crimes that conducted by blue-collar people (such as theft, store robbery, or even gang attacks).
Option B and D are wrong because 'Potential' victims do not always translate to actual victims, This will make the data that collected by the firm become misleading. They wouldn't find out the type of crimes that often happen in real life and wouldn't be able to design a proper solution for them.
Option C is the best choice from the available options. Even though it's not perfect. There are a lot of crimes that often goes unreported by the victims (such as domestic abuse)
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the present values of both alternatives is shown below:
For alternative one, the lump sum amount is
= Yearly payment × PVIFA factor at 8% for 12 years
= $50,000 × 7.5361
= $376,805
And, in the alternative 2, the lumpsum amount i.e. present value is $452,000
So as we can see that the alternative 2 is better as the lumspsum amount is high as compared with the alternative 1
Answer:
The demand for iPads increased.
Explanation:
If they raise the price of the iPads, this must mean more people want to buy them, so the demand for them is high.
