What do you mean this is confis
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Personal opinions:
“Always made good decisions”
“He was smart to stay out of the war”
“Probably couldn’t handle it”
Loaded language:
Good
Refused
Smart
I don’t see any examples of first or second person pronouns.
Answer:
C. The forces of the Texas settlers defeated the Mexican army. That led to independence for Texas and, later, the annexation by the United States.
Explanation:
I learned about it maybe two months ago? Anyways Mexico was forced to recognize Texas' independence after they were defeated. The reason they fought in the first place was because Mexico abolished slavery. Texan's feared that they would soon abolish it there too. I know for sure also that once they became independent it took awhile for the U.S. to annex them. Mostly because it would become a slave state and they wanted an even number of both slave and non-slave states.
