Answer:
d. makes all decisions internally about leadership and how the work is done and has the potential for high autonomy.
Explanation:
A self-directed team is a group of employees that works without a leader to reach an objective. As this team doesn't have a leader they work together to organize the job and set the rules and deadlines. This model give employees more responsability, increases satisfaction, and gives them autonomy. According to this, the answer is that a self-directed team makes all decisions internally about leadership and how the work is done and has the potential for high autonomy.
Answer:
2 Days
Explanation:
First, there is the need to rewrite the utility function for clarity
U=V^{1/2}
1. The Probability of Falling ill by someone in the family is given as 20%
2. If someone should fall ill, the total number of days that would be spoiled is calculated as:
Total number of vacation= 10 days x Probability to fall ill = 20%
= 10 x 0.2 = 2 days
This means if someone should fall ill based on the probability, then 2 out of the total 10 days can be ruined
3. The number of days for vacation days to enjoy is 10-2 = 8 days
This means if the family gives up 2 days of probable illness, they can still enjoy their vacation.
V= 2 days
A mortgage is a type of loan used to buy property, the bank gives you the money at an interest rate, but takes possession of your properties until you pay back the loan. The answer would be B!
Have a nice day! :)
Answer:
Performance.
Explanation:
A company wants to hire a model to appear in a television ad to promote its products. Prospective candidates have been asked to audition so that the company can choose the most suitable person. The candidates are being subjected to performance test. Prospective candidate's acting abilities, personality will be judged and analysed accordingly. They will given a written script which they have to read and acted as well. Their acting, voice quality, body movements and personalty will be looked upon and analysed whether he or she is the best fit for their television ad or not.
Answer:
this case tells us about some sort of pressures that accounts feel when financial statements are needed urgently
Explanation:
1) As for using low estimates, this step was wrong on her part. she should have been upfront in her estimates. for the items that she could not estimate there should have been an indication that such items were still under review, instead of doing what she did to give the financial estimate a good look. Using guesses or deliberately using low estimates was a bad idea, GAAP would never condone that.
She should have met with the president and let him know that finalization of the financial statements would not possible within the time frame that he has given. She could have also explain that such delays are normal and she would have given estimates of when the draft internal copy would be made available to him. such steps she took could have resulted in serious consequences for the company
2) I would not inflate or deflate the figures on purpose to make financial statements look better. If it is time to present the draft and final year-end financial statements I will have to tell the truth on the numbers and estimations used and also the reasons for that. i would have explained the constraints that i was facing. if i was still being pressurized by the president, i would have no choice than to call it quits instead of going against the ethics of my profession, since there are both ethical and legal implications to not giving inaccurate financial statements.
