Answer:
The correct option is the statement that reads " If a firm commits to making its environment a good place to work,workers will not leave"
Explanation:
The most qualified employees are always been poached because of the value they add to any organization,hence the first statement is absolute truth.
The second statement is wrong because there the best working environment cannot stop people from resigning,what in case someone needs to study masters abroad?
A certain level of turnover is healthy since it paves from for new hands with fresh perspective to be hired.
However, when turnovers becomes excessive,it implies a fundamental problem with the workplace.
Answer:
$88,920
Explanation:
capitalized interest = weighted average accumulated expenditure for the year x interest rate of the loan = $889,200 x 10% = $88,920
Capitalized interest can be added to the basis of the new building that is being constructed. This way, the building's depreciable value will increase.
I would recommend a savings account
Answer:
V = 3.5 (1 dollar circulates 3.5 times in a year)
In short term – Reduction of aggregate demand and real output
In long term – reduction of wages and increase of real output of firms
Nominal GDP will fall by $20 bilion
Explanation:
Equation of monetisation =
Total money in circulation = Total money demanded/total output
Money Supply * Money Velocity = Price Level * GDP
V = PY/M
Substituting the given values, we get –
V = 336/96
V = 3.5
This indicates 1 dollar circulates 3.5 times in a year
In short term – Reduction of aggregate demand and real output
In long term – reduction of wages and increase of real output of firms
Nominal GDP will fall by $20 bilion
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Brazil only.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an organization or individual to produce at lower opportunity costs. This is achieved by introducing efficient productivity strategies or achieving economies of scale.
For the case given, the comparative advantage of Brazil and Chile is based on labor productivity only. Then:
- <em>The comparative advantage of Chile on sugar</em> =
= 0.4 - <em>The comparative advantage of Brazil on sugar </em>=
= 0.5
Thus, <em>Brazil has a comparative advantage over Chile on sugar.</em>
