Answer:
245,000 is the answer please give brainliest
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
106n=310
n=300/106=150/53
Diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other. It is not relevant that PN=9. since AO=4 then AM=4
Answer:
first answer is 9.84
Step-by-step explanation:
9.84 is the square root of 97, rounded to the nearest hundredth.
the legs measure 9 x 9 and 4 x 4 = 81 and 16.
81 + 16 = 97, so your answer is the square root of 27, which rounded to the nearest hundredth, equals 9.84. Rounding towards the nearest whole, 10 would be your best bet.
hope this helps!!
