Yeah, I am pretty sure it is in 2004.
Answer:
In my opinion the concepts of diversity and equity must be always adopted in the companies as a way to be successful taking into account different perspectives especially understanding that the workforce should not be based in the personal traits to be considered as barriers for the professional development.
Explanation:
On the other side, those kinds of personal differences must be considered for the benefit of the company if they are going to be considered in some way. For example, in the released campaign of a certain product the members of the company could be encouraged to give their opinion taking into account their cultural background regarding their nationalities, race, religious beliefs familial status and all the characteristic that can make them unique to offer the constructive critics explaining the reasons why the product must be changed in some aspects.
I considered that these diverse traits must not be considered unless it would be for the benefit of the participant workers of the company and the company itself, due to the fact that it is a topic that can result really sensible if it not treated in a careful way.
The similarities between eastern and western philosophy are greater than any differences cited by modern-day writers and lecturers on the topic. The most often cited difference is that western philosophy is 'fragmentary' while eastern philosophy is 'holistic'.
An archenemy is someone who is hostile towards someone or something else. In this case, the US and Soviet Union were archenemies because they were both very powerful and both of them wanted to be better than the other.
Hope this helps :)
The country had feared that population growth was hindering economic development, so in 1979, the Chinese government implemented one crucial policy to control its population: a one child per family policy. It also implemented birth control programs and offered economic incentives to families with fewer children.
