I'm not sure whether you have any options, but here are some of the ways you can ensure that proper plans are installed for the creditors section in the future:
1. Proper handing and monitoring of resources which includes systems, documentation, and procedures - this is very important, to take care of everything so that there are no mistakes
2. Finances must be reviewed correctly, either it is external or internal - unless you do this, you are facing a risk of losing yours, as well as creditors' money
3. Perform and conduct series of simulations before actual implementation - you need to know whether your changes will work before you actually introduce them
Bottom-Up Estimating is the most common, real-world method of estimating projects. Option c is correct.
<h3>What is the bottom up estimating technique?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the estimation of work by making use of the details that are the possible least.
This method is known to be the most common method that is made use of while going through real world projects.
Read more on the Bottom-Up Estimating here:
brainly.com/question/17283932
#SPJ1
Answer:
The quantities of products that should be produced each month are:
300, 300, 300, 300, and 300 respectively.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Production Scheduling Based on Level Strategy:
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Total
Beginning Inventory 0 100 100 -100 -100 0
Production 300 300 300 300 300 1,500
Forecast Demand 200 300 500 300 200 1,500
Ending Inventory 100 100 -100 -100 0 0
b) The implication is that the firm will be running in shortage for two months within the five months period. This is not ideal to meet customers' demands. It appears very costly with the holding and shortage costs throughout the period.
Answer:
Netsuite
Hope this answer helps you :)
Have a great day
mark brainliest
Answer:
Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act
Explanation:
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, (enacted November 12, 1999) is an act of the 106th United States Congress (1999–2001). It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company. With the bipartisan passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies were allowed to consolidate. Furthermore, it failed to give to the SEC or any other financial regulatory agency the authority to regulate large investment bank holding companies. The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.