Answer:
No, Nelson cannot sue. The US Supreme Court ruled that regardless of the monstrous activities carried out by the Saudi government and the fact that they tend to solve commercial disputes by putting people in jail and torturing them, the events happened in Saudi Arabia. And they were not related to the contract signed by Nelson, the police and the hospital are considered sperate entities by the US laws.
The court recognized that Saudi behavior was really bad, but they had jurisdiction over it. This is a strictly police matter. Saudi Arabia and most Arab states are known for these type of activities, but people continue to go to work there because they offer high salaries. They forget that a golden cage is still a prison.
Answer:
Explanation:
In a scenario such as this one, the broker-dealer is not required to disclose whether any guarantee of growth was made by the representative to induce the giving of the testimonial. This is backed by the FINRA rule on testimonials used in communications which states the following:
“Retail communications or correspondence providing any testimonial concerning the investment advice or investment performance of a member or its products must prominently disclose the following:
- The fact that the testimonial may not be representative of the experience of other customers.
- The fact that the testimonial is no guarantee of future performance or success.
- If more than $100 in value is paid for the testimonial, the fact that it is a paid testimonial.”
Answer:
The correct option is A,5.72 times
Explanation:
The number of times that interest charges gives a sense of how financial stable is in its ability to pay interest on bonds as at when due.It is key consideration for prospective bondholders when assessing whether to buy bonds in a particular company
Number of times interest charges earned=net income before interest/interest
net income before interest charges=net income+interest charges
net income is $340,000
interest charges=$1,200,000*6%=$72,000
net income before interest charges=$340,000+$72,000=$412,000
number of times interest was earned=$412,000/$72,000=5.72
Answer:
The conception of man as an economic animal is implied by the view that economic production is the determining “factor” or “sphere” of man or society. Against this conception can be put another, that of man as praxis. This takes account of man as a creative being, capable of realizing his freedom through his own activity. In this article the theory of the determining role of the “economic factor”, and the theory of factors in general have been examined. The economic interpretation of history, a variant of the theory of factors, has been acknowledged as partly true for the self‐alienated man and society, but the theory of factors in any variant has been found inadequate as a general theory of man, or society. The possibility of freedom cannot be reduced to the fact that the determining roles played by “factors”, vary, or to the hope that the economic “factor” can be subordinated to a “better” one. Man's freedom consists in his resolving the conflict of “factors”, and in realizing himself as an integral creative being, no longer split into independent and mutually opposed spheres.
Explanation:
that should help
Answer:
e. air-travel and weed killer
Explanation:
Cross price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded of good A to changes in price of good B.
If the cross price elasticity is zero, there is no relationship between the pair of goods
If cross price elasticity of demand is positive, it means that the goods are substitute goods.
The cross price elasticity of beef and pork and a laptop computer and a desktop computer should be positive
If the cross-price elasticity is negative, it means that the goods are complementary goods
. The cross price elasticity of an iPhones and earbuds should be negative
