Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
The statement that best describes one of Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms is Plato's Forms are material obiects.
<h3>How can the
Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms be described?</h3>
The Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms was base on the rejection of the theory behind the form but not the notion, since Aristotle believe that for every form that is been seen in existence, then there is something that form it.
In conclusion, Aristotle believe that no form is independent, hence he criticize the Plato's Forms by saying it is material obiects which makes the first option to be correct.
Therefore, the option A is correct.
Learn more about Aristotle at:
brainly.com/question/24994054
#SPJ1
Answer:
Sometimes
Explanation:
Brain damage can be very damaging or minimal depending on what part of the brain is damaged.
Answer: Reverse transcription
Explanation:
There is certain exception towards central dogma tat is described as follows:-
Reverse transcription:- it is the enzyme that helps in conversion of RNA into DNA as per concept of retrovirus.It has the ability to catalyze the DNA which emerges from RNA molecule.
RNA encoded virus in their life cycle experience a phase where they are approached through genomic RNA for getting converted into DNA which is caused through reverse transcriptase enzyme.
