The correct answer is He wanted Macedonia to have more power.
Philip II was king of Macedonia. He created the <u>"Macedonian phalanx"</u> - infantry that became fundamental to the achievements of his son Alexander the Great.
Under his rule, Macedonia widened its borders, making it the most important state on the Balkan peninsula.
Freedom to speech, worship, from want and fear.
Roosevelt delivered his speech 11 months before the US declared war on Japan. State of Union and the threat to other Democrats from World War that was being wades across the continents in the eastern hemisphere. The 1st two are protected by the 1st Amendment. The later 2 went went beyond the traditional Constitutional values protected by the US bill of rights<span />
Settlers were constantly taking more land than either they agreed for, or just what didnt belong to them, the Indians would fight back and lose in the end, they would shrink back and find more land, there would be peace for a little while, and then settlers would keep wanting more land
This depends on ideals and opinions but from my point of view it is not a fair and democratic way of selecting the president due to the fact that the citizens of this country have no real say in who is president. Therefore it is not democratic. Fair? No because the electoral college Can have biases just like any other human and they are not the majority. This goes hand in hand with the democracy question. If I was to be democratic. The citizens should cancel out what the electoral college says.
Now I’m the side of the reasoning as to why the electoral college exists. It’s understandable. Everyone is not trustable enough to decide the fate of the country. Overall it is not fair and democratic.
