This question focuses on the perspective of the three different characters that were spoken about?
<h3>How their perspectives was similar on the issue of Slavery</h3>
Douglas, Harriet and Nat all agreed that slavery was evil. They all tried in the ways that they could to see that people had their freedom and rights regardless of their race.
<h3>How their perspective differed</h3>
The differences in perspective can be seen in the strategies they employed to seek for freedom
<u>Harriet Tubman:</u>
Tubman believed in helping the people held in captivity to escape through the underground tunnel.
<u>Nat Turner:</u>
He believed in the use of violence and rebellion as a way to fight against the slave institution.
<u>Frederick Douglas:</u>
Frederick believed that the constitution could be rewritten in such a way that it would abolish slavery. Hence he used his pen to write against slavery in a way that he could sway people's minds.
Read more on slavery here: brainly.com/question/9374853
#SPJ1
Human capital refers to the knowledge, skill sets and motivation that people have, which provide economic value. Human capital realizes that not everyone has the same skill sets or knowledge and that quality of work can be improved by investing in people's education.
Economic growth is an increase in an economy's ability, compared to past periods, to produce goods and services. It can be measured by measuring the percentage in the real gross domestic product (GDP) of a country. For example, suppose a country increased its real GDP at an annual rate of 2.5%. This country is experiencing economic growth and has an increase in the value of all goods and services.
These are all symptoms of an episode of mania. This is a
state of abnormally heightened arousal and can manifest in euphoric or
irritable forms and intensified irritable effects can even lead to violence or
anxiety. Hypomania, which is a lower manic state, if irritable is really unpleasant
but more severe states than hypomania can also be accompanied with psychosis,
disorientation and other severe symptoms.
If you have rights; those rights have to be protected somehow, and this might take work. This work can be another person's duty (for example, a policeman should protect your safety). If we only had rights, there would be no way of enforcing them: in this way duties can be seen as a way of ensuring that our, and others', rights are respected. They go together, as two sides of a coin.
