The answer is D because when it happened banks closed
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
Answer:
False
Explanation:
They put there own personal beliefs into the event and how they feel.
Alissa is memorizing her grocery list: Eggs, bacon, sugar, apples, bread, hamburger, pop tarts, carrots, chicken, tea, eggplant,
pashok25 [27]
Answer:
The ones at the end.
Explanation:
The recency effect is a memory effect that occurs when more recent information is better remembered than does earlier-presented information.
This effect says that people tend to have a <u>better memory for information they were told more recently.</u>
This effect is the opposite of the primacy effect which refers to the tendency to recall information presented at the start of a list better than information at the middle or end.
Since Alissa is memorizing her grocery list, <u>according to the recency effect she will have a better memory for the items that she saw more recentl</u>y, thus, this would mean, t<u>he terms at the end of the list.</u> (as opposed to the primacy effect where she would recall the first ones)
