In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1
Answer:
if we take ratio then answer is option D
Answer:
See the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Statement </u><u> </u><u> Reason</u>
1.∠1 and ∠2 are supplementary angles --- Given
2. m∠1 + m∠2 = 180° --- Linear pair, they are supplementary
3. m∠1 and m∠3 are supplementary angles -- m∠1 + m∠3= 180
(Supplementary angles add upto 180 degrees)
4. m∠1 and m∠3 ------ Exterior sides in opposite rays
5. m∠1 + m∠2 = m∠1 + m∠3 ------ Transitive property
6. m∠2 = m∠3 -------------- Subtraction property
7. l || m ------------- If two lines are cut by transversal the alternative interior
angles are the same, then the lines are paralle.
Thank you.
Estimate is <span>roughly calculate or judge the value, number, quantity, or extent of </span>the answer is 13,000