1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
TEA [102]
3 years ago
13

Which two statements explain why most American Indians initially supported the French in the French and Indian War?

History
1 answer:
Liono4ka [1.6K]3 years ago
5 0

2. The French were mostly interested in trading furs, not settling land.

When the French first came to  America between the 1530’s and 1540’s they engaged in fur trading with the American Indians. Also, the french learnt their languages and ways, treated them with respect and had no interest in displacing them off their lands. This led the Natives to side with the French later.

4. Britan wanted to take land to set up farms for british settlers

The reason why most American Indians initially supported the French in the French and Indian War was because the British were taking control over their land. On the opposite side, the french treated the as equals and had no interest in displacing them from their lands

You might be interested in
Which book, uncle tom's cabin or the impending crisis of the south was more important? explain?
alekssr [168]
<span>Answer:
       'Uncle Tom's Cabin' had a much more dramatic effect upon public opinion than Helper. Stowe really went for the emotions and stirred up the citizens both North and South in great numbers. Helper was significant but more on the intellectual and political side.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
To become a citizen of the united states you must
Margaret [11]
Pass the citizenship test, pass a health test
7 0
3 years ago
What reason was given for needing an embargo on cuba? (john f kennedy)
Liula [17]

IAnswer:

Im not sure how well this use of the information will help you but,

Source: "<em>In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban government and directed the Department of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban Government, and directed the Departments of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. Beyond criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the United States holds $6 billion worth of financial claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, an appropriate response to these unaddressed claims."</em>

Paraphrasing - In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between  U. S. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between u. s. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo, that remains in situ these days. on the far side of criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the U.S. holds a $6 billion value of economic claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, Associate in Nursing applicable response to those unaddressed claims.

Explanation:

The "source" is the information where i got it from and the "paraphrased" part is fully rewritten, ps sorry if it's a bit long and wordy! hope this helps have a great day :)

7 0
2 years ago
Write a paragraph of at least 125 words that considers why D.W. Griffith's movie, Birth of a Nation, was so controversial.​
Burka [1]

Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.

“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.

 

6 0
3 years ago
3
alexandr402 [8]

Answer:he has plundered our seas ravaged our coasts burnt our towns and destroyed the lives of our people

Explanation:I think

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3 Why did Union Major Anderson take possession of Fort Sumter? Cite
    7·1 answer
  • What problems did america face as it entered the war of 1812?
    8·1 answer
  • Which state's votes became a major problem in 2000 presidential election?
    15·2 answers
  • Why is the city of nanjing extremely vulnerable to Japanese attack
    15·2 answers
  • Which best describes a bill of rights?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did some slave traders operate illegally, even before the slave trade was outlawed by many nations?
    14·1 answer
  • Which areas were the focus of President Johnson’s Great Society programs? Check all that apply. civil rights poverty education h
    10·2 answers
  • What is Imperialism? Why did nations engage in this practice?
    9·1 answer
  • Examine evidence about how the arrival of Columbus’s expedition in the Americas affected native populations.
    7·2 answers
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete each sentence.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!