The correct answer is individualism.
In the individualist society, everybody puts themselves and their own needs first, and then the others come second. Personal success is very important for such people, and the others aren't as relevant in their lives as in collectivist societies, for example.
I’m pretty sure I read about this is school basically a bunch of school kids who were black went to a White only cafe and sat at the counter and refused to move kinda like Rosa Parks did on the bus they were beaten and yelled but yet they refused to move I think some got arrested pls look this up and double check that’s just what I learned It was this also isn’t the only sit in but I just find this most fascinating since they were young students who made an impact
Answer:
c. would create a negative self-fulfilling prophecy
Explanation:
Douglas McGregor was an industrial psychologist, which in his theory analyzed how a negative vision (lack of responsibility, tendency to work as little as possible, low motivation, etc.) would imply a management style of authoritarian and controlling nature, tending to correct with a control external the low involvement of workers.
Answer
The Code of Hammurabi were enacted in Babylonia circa 1792 to 1750 B.C.E. It is one of the most ancient legal codes written in human history. All Babylonian citizens ought to abide to this set of rules, including the king. Therefore, it limited the king's power and prevented him to impose his will, it was against the law.
Explanation
The Code of Hammurabi is was King Hammurabi’s attempt to set a clear set of rules to all people living in a complex, large and ever-growing empire. The code intended to establish clear rules that govern people behaviour, what was considered unlawful and the punishment a citizen would expect when breaking the law. For instance, it forbidden slander, perjury, fraud, theft and adultery. It also created a legal framework for trade, slavery, divorce, liability and the relationship between workers and landowners.
The code was not necessarily fair. It was especially harsh on lower classes and women, making the laws unequal. For instance, the punishments received by higher classes when they had a dispute were far lenient than the ones imposed on lower classes.
However, and in spite this unfairness, the code limited the capacity of a single ruler to impose his/her own will over other people. The clear set of rules prevented the king from using subjective appraisals to judge singular cases. All people would measure with the same rules, and these could not change from situation to situation.
