Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
Answer:
12
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The number of miles Mark runs in each track be 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us assume that the number of miles Mark run in each track meet be x.
As given
Mark ran 875 miles this year in the track club.
Mark ran in 52 track meets and ran the same number of miles in each.
Than the equation becomes
52 × x = 875
Therefore the number of miles Mark runs in each track be
6 divided by 1/4 = 24 + 12 divided by 1/4 = 48, then 48 + 24 = 72
