Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Step-by-step explanation:
D. Yes, because the Shermans paid a higher percentage of their income in sales tax than the Westins did.
The Westins made $86,000 (high income)
The Shermans made $33,000 (low income)
But both paid the same sales tax rate of $14,000.
Regressive tax is applied uniformly and this causes lower-income people to pay a larger share of their income than rich people. It is not a fair way though it seems to be. Most regressive taxes are not income taxes.
Given a square ABCD and an equilateral triangle
DPC and given a chart with which
Jim is using to prove that triangle APD is
congruent to triangle BPC.
From the chart, it can be seen that Jim proved that two corresponding sides of both triangles are congruent and that the angle between those two sides for both triangles are also congruent.
Therefore, the justification to complete Jim's proof is "SAS postulate".
Answer:
y times x,m+b
Step-by-step explanation:
