Answer:
$746.77
Explanation:
Calculation to Determine Hank's net pay for the week
Gross Pay $1320.00
Straight Time Pay 940.00
(40 × $23.50.)
Overtime pay 105.75
[ (43-40)× $23.50 ×1.5)]
Less Federal Income tax (198.00)
(15% × $1320.00)
Less OASDI and Medicare (100.98)
(7.65% × $1320.00)
Net Pay $746.77
Therefore Hank's net pay for the week will be $746.77
Answer:
b. $22.75
Explanation:
We know that
Contribution margin per unit= Sales price per unit - variable cost per unit
Since the selling price is $35
And, the contribution margin is 35%
Therefore, the contribution margin per unit would be
= $35 × 35 per cent
= $12.25
Now add these figures in the formula above.
Hence, the value would be equal to
= $35 - $12.25
= $22.75
The inventory and labor costs are included in the variable cost
People who work in Health Science career clusters can expect a career that deals with promoting health to treating diseases. Some examples of professions in this cluster include dietitians, neurologists, and biomedical engineers. With a wide variety of professions that are included in this cluster, the workplaces where these individuals can work are also equally as diverse.
Thus, the best answer for the question is (C) workplaces in this cluster include nonprofit hospitals, government-run clinics, and private physicians' offices.
Answer:
Direct material price variance= $12,500 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following formula:
The standard price per pound is $2.00.
The actual quantity of materials purchased and used in production is 50,000 pounds.
The actual purchase price per pound of materials was $2.25.
<u>To calculate the direct material price (spending) variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Direct material price variance= (standard price - actual price)*actual quantity
Direct material price variance= (2 - 2.25)*50,000
Direct material price variance= $12,500 unfavorable
Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
