What is your actual question?
Answer:
Parents meeting their basic needs, Privacy protections in school, and special workplace protects.
Explanation:
the right to consent to medical treatment- Minors are typically under the age of 18 and can't exactly consent to alot of medical treatment or procedures, especially ones where medication after will be required.
requirements that parents meet their basic needs- That's a basic parenting requirement: Food, water, Shelter, Clothes, etc
the right to vote in federal elections- Minors under 18 are not allowed to vote in some places
greater privacy protections in schools- This is basically a parental thing I think, but it keeps their information from getting leaked by the staff.
special workplace protections- They have easier working hours to accomadate school and anything else. Their job is basically bent to meet their school life.
You'll have to consider for yourself what your own thoughts are, but some of the issues were these:
The United States saw the use of the atomic bombs as a way to bring the war to an end in a way that would cost less American lives. A land invasion of Japan would have meant many American soldiers being killed in battle. However, the cost in Japanese lives was enormous by the use of the bombs, and that was not given equal consideration.
Another consideration was that the United States had been engaging in a fire-bombing campaign of Japanese cities prior to the use of atomic bombs. The fire-bombing campaigns were horrifically destructive also, but did not have the radiation after-effects of atomic bombings.
An option that could have been used rather than dropping atomic bombs was to enlist Soviet troops in a joint invasion of Japan. But the USA wanted to avoid postwar Soviet presence in Japan, and the atomic bombs were seen as a way of ending the war quickly. You can consider whether it would have been a more "moral" way of pursuing war to conduct a land invasion with Soviet assistance.
Finally, the escalation to the point of using atomic bombs was, in part, due to the Allies' insistence on an "unconditional surrender" by Japan. A second bomb was dropped at Nagasaki after the first was dropped on Hiroshima, because Japan did not submit to unconditional surrender in the immediate aftermath of the Hiroshima bombing. You can consider for yourself whether some other resolution besides "unconditional surrender" was a viable option for ending the war with Japan.
