Answer: $6,600
Explanation:
Income, although not typically in a taxpayer’s possession, is usually constructively received in the taxable year which is when it is credited to the person's account, or made available so that the person may draw upon it at any time, or could have drawn upon it in the taxable year when the notice of intention to withdraw has already been given.
However, income is not constructively received when the taxpayer’s control of receipt is subject to limitations or restrictions. In this case, the last month’s rent ($600 security deposit) has already been constructively received and is included; but, the rent that was received in January for the December rent has not been constructively received and is therefore not included for a total of $6,600 which was derived from the [$600 deposit which was last month rent + ($600 × 10 months Feb-Nov)].
= $600 + $6000
= $6600
In an ethnographic study of black and white working-class men, Deirdre Royster (2003) found that the job market was Not fair and not meritocratic
Explanation:
Deirdre Royster has put this popular wisdom to a test – revealing the subtleties and inequalities of a place of work in the Race and the Invisible Hand which favour the white person looking for jobs above the black one.
Royster is finding a reference in the stories of 25 black and 25 white men from the same vocational school who were looking for work on the same blue collar job market in the beginning of the 1990's.
Having carefully studied the professional successes, work ethics and values of Black men in the sense of particular deprivations, her research shows that young black and white men are the main differences— access to connections that are very relevant in job searches and admission.
Answer:
Option C is correct because the primary objective of the SEC is to monitor the compliance with laws and ensures that the corrective actions are taken once the irregularities are found regarding the stocks, derivatives and the matters related to the sale and purchase of securities.
Answer:
The correct and labeled image of the price ceiling is attached :
Explanation:
The Price ceiling is the legal maximum price, it is ineffective and not true for the market equilibrium price. It is always less than the market price equilibrium.
The correct image on the basis of the given instruction and to the price 3.14bis attached to the answer please zoom to see the clear image.
It will take an approximate of 52 years to triple the initial investment.
The formula for Future value is <em>A = Pe^(rt)</em>
<u></u>
<u>Given Information</u>
Triple amount
Rate = 2.1%
![3 = e^(.0.021t)\\ln(3) = 0.021t\\t = ln(3)/0.021\\t = 1.09861228867 / 0.021\\t = 52.314870889\\t = 52.31](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3%20%3D%20e%5E%28.0.021t%29%5C%5Cln%283%29%20%3D%200.021t%5C%5Ct%20%3D%20ln%283%29%2F0.021%5C%5Ct%20%3D%201.09861228867%20%2F%200.021%5C%5Ct%20%3D%2052.314870889%5C%5Ct%20%3D%2052.31)
Therefore, it will take an approximate of 52 years to triple the initial investment.
See similar solution here
<em>brainly.com/question/19649471</em>