Answer:
Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias </em>because its indicators taking values of 1 and 0 where 1 would represent taking action by the legal system and 0 would represent not taking action by the legal system. as
The researcher plans to regress national income per capita based on the effect of the legal system
applying the formula for addressing omitted variable bias ( attached below )
Step-by-step explanation:
There is a total amount of vehicle of 100
which is good because now you can say 73% is cars 16% is small trucks 6% is large trucks and 2% motorcycle and 3% bicycle. Adding the trucks (small 16, large 6) gives us 24% so you can do 100% - 24% and get 74%. Thanks and goodbye!
The formula to use here would be:
A = P(1+r)^t where P is the principal (starting) amount, r is the rate of interest, and t is time. Knowing this, plug in your values:
A = 14,000(1+0.07)^4 once worked out, you should get $18,351.14414 < this is the total amount he would be paying at the end of 4 years. to find the interest, subtract this amount from the principal amount (14,000):
$18,5351.14414 - 14,000 = 4,351.14414 < this is the amount of interest. Round your answer.
Answer: Jamal will pain $4,351.14 interest.
6 seconds = 540 m
-----------------------------
Find 1 second:
-----------------------------
6 sec = 540 m
1 sec = 540 ÷ 6
1 sec = 90m
-----------------------------
Find 4 seconds:
-----------------------------
1 sec = 90m
4 sec = 90 x 4
4 sec = 360 m
----------------------------------------------------------
Answer: It can travel 360m in 4 seconds.
----------------------------------------------------------
1,388.26-200.86=1,187.40
If she makes 79.16 you need to multiply until you get more or exactly to 1,187.40
I’m order to succeed this amount she must work (15 WEEKS) to save enough money.
