Answer:
B. Words stored in echoic memory will last for 3 to 4 seconds, so you can still recall her words.
Explanation:
We have different types of memory, one of those types of memory is echoic memory.
This memory is a type of sensory memory that register sounds, when we first hear something, the sound is stored in this memory so it can be processed. The stimuli last about 3 to 4 seconds in the echoic memory (that's why sometimes we can hear something after it was said even if we're not paying attention)
In this example, your mom is lecturing you and you lose concentration, when she asks you if you're listening and you are able to repeat the last few things she said. We can see that this is an effect of the echoic memory, that <u>has stored the last 3-4 seconds of your mom's lecture and you can repeat this even if you were not paying attention. </u>
This statement is false. B.F. Skinner is not responsible for establishing the law effect instead he developed a science philosophy called radical behaviorism. On the other hand, Edgar L. Thorndike was the one who developed this law. Ins
Ethnic Enclaves is the correct asnwer.
Throughout history, we see immigrants moving from one place to the other and often staying in neighborhoods with people with whom they shared the same nationality, culture and similar habits. In Sociology and Anthropology, an ethnic enclave is defined as a geographic area where a community that shares similar background maintains a strong sense of identity and customs from their place of origin. These ethnic enclaves were the most common option for these immigrants since they felt more welcome and safer from prejudice and discrimination.
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
