When bargains are so oppressive that the court decides to relieve innocent parties of their duties, such bargains are deemed?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Aleks04 [339]2 years ago

7 0

That bargains will be deemed as unconscionable

Unconscionable bargains will be punishable by laws because it's seen as something that is made as an effort misrepresent, to extort , or to trick other people into fraud.

When people are proven to be guilty for unconscionable bargains, it is really rare for courts to impose a jail time as punishments. Those people would most likely forced to renew the contract or have to financially compensate their victims plus additional fines to the court.

You might be interested in

35. This individual raced against Nikola Tesla to develop a working radio? (Pages 568-569) _____________________________________

kiruha [24]

Answer:

Guglielmo Marconi. Guglielmo Marconi raced against Nikola Tesla to develop a working radio; Alexander Graham Bell;

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

An immigrant couple has a child in a country where both

klasskru [66]

Answer:Birthright citizenship

Explanation:A P E X verified

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Mark views society as a system of interrelated parts, while john views society as composed of groups competing for scarce resour

just olya [345]

A fight between people, he is bad

5 0

3 years ago

What do most elections for local, state, and federal offices have in common?

kicyunya [14]

<h3>Answer:</h3>

A). They are winner-takes-all elections.

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

The reason why answer choice "A). They are winner-takes-all elections" is the correct answer because this is what our local, state, and federal elections use to elect someone for office.

The term "winner-takes-all" pretty much means who ever wins get everything, in this case the position in office. The winner-takes-all is implemented in the election because the person that has the most votes would win, so they would take the position in office.

The U.S has been using the winner-takes-all method for many years. This allows people to choose a representative that they think would be the best in office for the city, state, or country.

For example, the U.S President election runs by the "winner-takes-all" method because which ever candidate has the most electoral votes wins, or they just need to hit the 270 electoral votes to win. This is how "winner-takes-all" works in the elections.

<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was Alexander Hamilton’s main reason for insisting that all the nation’s debts must be paid in full?

Mandarinka [93]

The main reason was so that the country would attract investors and also that the country could borrow in the future .

Alexander Hamilton was an American statesman who died in 1804, he was one of the pioneers of US. He led in the Federal government's financing of the states' obligations, and in addition building up a national bank, an arrangement of tariffs, and agreeable exchange relations with England.

8 0

2 years ago